A Diagnostic Software for Managing Battle at its Sources

To efficiently resolve a battle or dispute, Alex Colvin (Cornell), Dionne Pohler (Saskatchewan), and I assert that you will need to first perceive its roots or sources, after which appropriately match a dispute decision technique. We name this “managing battle at its sources.” To this finish, we’ve created a three-part typology of the roots of battle—particularly, structural, cognitive, and dispositional sources of battle—to facilitate the identification of efficient dispute decision strategies tailor-made to the actual sources of a given dispute. 

This may be facilitated by a diagnostic device that helps events to a battle ask the appropriate questions. For starters,

1. Diagnose the structural nature of the connection between the events

  • What are their pursuits or objectives, rights, and sources of energy? 
  • What are their worth orientations or id wants?
  • What are the principles or establishments that govern their relationship?
  • Are there scarce assets concerned? 
  • Why are the events in a relationship collectively? Are there higher different choices? How a lot does their success rely upon the opposite’s?
  • If there are causes for a long-lasting interdependency, are their pursuits principally in a position to be aligned (mutual self-benefit), principally conflicting with every, or a combination of each?

2. Diagnose the cognitive sources of battle

  • What cognitive frames form how every participant perceives and interprets the scenario, and influences desired motion? This may mirror tradition, particular person experiences, and particular person preferences.  
  • Are there cognitive limitations (e.g., info overload) or cognitive biases (e.g., loss aversion, anchoring, framing, fixed-pie notion, exaggeration of battle, illusions of transparency, determination fatigue, or overconfidence)?
  • Are there info limitations, imbalances, and/or uncertainties?
  • Are there intergroup tensions primarily based on in-group/out-group identification?
  • Are there sources of miscommunication, comparable to noisy communication channels, totally different meanings, incorrect filtering of intent, and misinterpretation of nonverbal cues and private demeanor?

3. Diagnose the dispositional sources of battle

  • What feelings or temper may be positively or negatively affecting the scenario?
  • Are there character elements that form how a number of individuals really feel, suppose, and/or behave? 
  • Are there variations in character that conflict?

Not all of those will apply in each scenario. However for people who do, the diagnostic device then helps join these underlying sources with the implications for how you can handle this sort of battle. 

The animated model of “Managing Battle at its Sources” additionally offers an introductory overview: 


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.